![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Breaker Oil Analysis A Diagnostic Service That Saves Money.It has been a longstanding, standard practice for maintenance personnel to perform fluid quality tests such as dielectric breakdown voltage to confirm an acceptable fluid condition when returning or placing oil-filled circuit breakers into service. Some utilities have also used these screening tests to continue monitoring fluid condition of in-service Oil-filled circuit breakers (OCB’s). Further assessment of in-tank condition required removing the OCB from service for internal inspections. Contact resistance measurements, and other intrusive maintenance activity. In 1996, TJ/H2b began to search for a diagnostic marker for the detection of a particular failure mode in one type of OCB. The outgrowth of that effort was the development of the world’s first fluid-based OCB condition assessment tool, Breaker Oil Analysis (BOATM). By the beginning of 1998, BOATM had been successfully applied to thousands of transmission and distribution breakers as well as to oil-filled switches. The cost benefits from using BOATM are primarily achieved through the reduction of unnecessary maintenance activities. Using traditional ASTM methodology and particle profiling, condition codes are generated by evaluating the relationships among the test data. BOATM provides information about coke formation, contact deterioration, fluid degradation, and interrupter deterioration (baffles, arc chutes housing, etc.). Application of this diagnostic tool allows maintenance personnel to depart from traditional time-based maintenance practices by monitoring the condition of units to determine when maintenance becomes necessary. BOATM also provides a guide for the maintenance practices by monitoring the condition of units to determine when maintenance becomes necessary. BOATM also provides a guide for the maintenance to be performed by indicating when components reach the end of their useful life or when abnormal conditions threaten the life or operation of the circuit breaker.
BOATM has been extensively field-tested and has proven to enhance equipment reliability. No false negatives have occurred with the BOATM service, which means that no tanks that have been assessed have been found to be in a poorer condition than indicated. Conversely, false positives are not a concern because BOATM has been designed to address the residual contamination of tanks from prior maintenance activities. This can occur when the used oil is replaced in the unit after repairs are made or when the unit is insufficiently cleaned and flushed after maintenance. Consider the following case history The breaker oil analysis for the unit in the table and figures below indicated a condition 4. Based on the BOA tank assessment, the breaker was scheduled for open tank inspection.
The inspection revealed (see figures below)
All of the contacts and interrupters were replaced. Since the condition of the oil was poor, it was replaced after the overhaul. Current distribution of condition codes for the utility industry The Figures below represent baseline testing for a normal distribution of oil-filled circuit breakers: Statistics for Utility Industry / Population Size: 15,000 Mix: 50% Transmission: 50% Distribution Code 1: 69.0% Code 2: 26.0% Code 3: 3.0% Code 4: 2.0% Code 4: 1.0% As a rough estimate, assume that all units with a condition code 4 require maintenance. According to the figures above, only 3% of the units would require immediate attention. For most utilities, this number will be significantly smaller than the number scheduled for maintenance on a time-interval basis. Cost Savings Using BOATM Diagnostics for Condition Based Maintenance Maintenance costs may be reduced by as much as ninety-two percent (92%) depending on the type of maintenance program currently being used. As an example, compare a six-year fixed-interval maintenance program to a condition-based program that results in an average maintenance interval of ten years. In this example, the annual average condition-based maintenance would be sixty percent of the maintenance performed using the fixed interval approach. Maintenance would be reduced by forty percent. The table below indicates the savings that will be obtained by using the condition-based approach instead of a time-based interval. To find the savings, simply match the percentage of units that will require maintenance based on their condition code with the number of years in the fixed-time maintenance cycle.
The savings indicated in the table are impressive especially considering that equipment reliability is not compromised. The BOATM Service is available exclusively at TJ/H2b Analytical Services.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | About Us
| Diagnostics | Contact Us
| Publications
| Meetings Copyright © 1997 - 2008 TJ/H2b Analytical Services Inc. Contact Us |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||